

Europe 2031: Europe's AI Future Will Be Determined by Its Applications
Europe is unlikely to win the AI race anytime soon. Anyone who bases their strategy on that assumption will likely learn otherwise sooner or later.
That is precisely why it is worth taking a look at “Europe 2031.” Not because future scenarios are particularly reliable in and of themselves, but because this paper highlights a number of interdependencies that are already relevant to European companies today.
The key question is: What happens if the critical infrastructure, platforms, and access points are not controlled in Europe?
A recent example illustrates this point: Anthropic temporarily shut down its most powerful model, Fable 5, after a U.S. government order required that it be used only by U.S. citizens. Because this was virtually impossible to implement from an operational standpoint, the model was completely deactivated.
This case illustrates very clearly what “Europe 2031” describes: Whoever controls the infrastructure ultimately controls access as well.
Today, Europe controls only a small portion of global AI computing capacity, while the U.S. holds the largest share. For companies, this is an important strategic starting point. After all, Europe’s weakness lies not in a lack of ideas, but in its dependence on other countries and the associated legislation, as well as in inconsistent values and corresponding content bias. AI produces what people put into it. That is why it also matters who provides the input and which models and providers are actually available.
What many people underestimate is that, for the vast majority of business applications, this issue is still far from playing a decisive role. Until we achieve an excellent global standard for applications, it is not crucial whether Europe can establish a leading AI model on the market. What is far more important is whether European organizations learn to use AI effectively in routine tasks, build internal expertise, and develop reliable, resilient systems that support and advance businesses in the long term.
Our greatest opportunities lie in:
Competitive advantages in Europe can arise when companies transform their processes, empower their employees, establish stable workflows, and integrate AI into their daily work.
That is precisely why AI expertise is not just a “nice-to-have” for Europe. It is becoming a matter of economic resilience. If only a few players determine who is allowed to use which models, dependencies arise that extend far beyond technology. The goal then is to be able to act independently and perhaps even turn this capability into added value that also benefits the creators of the technical infrastructure.
The clear priority for companies in Europe is therefore to strengthen their capabilities in AI applications. This means:
Conclusion
At Leaders of AI, our work is precisely geared toward this goal. The focus is always on how to create added value for real, day-to-day operations using simple methods and accessible AI technologies.
Europe does not need to secure its position through technology. Instead, we should focus specifically on the aspects that are already having a real impact today: application in a real-world business context.
You can find more information about the “Europe 2031” paper here: https://europe2031.ai/summary/
Hansi
AI Copywriter on the 'Leaders ofAI' team